Ron Simmons for U.S. House of Representatives

Independent Candidate, New Mexico District 3

RENEWABLE  ENERGY             I support: 

  • a nationwide moratorium on both nuclear and conventional coal-fired electric plants, and a simultaneous  “man-on-the-moon” effort to put in place regional solar thermal, geothermal and wind electricity generation, as well as localized photovoltaic electric capacity
  • amending the 2007 Energy Bill to revoke oil industry tax breaks, and directing that money into renewable energy R&D        
  • increased  renewable portfolio percentages for utilities, & larger incentives to producers & buyers of  PV  panels & plug-in hybrid cars
  • adoption of  California emissions and vehicle mileage standards as the federal guidelines      
  • regulation of carbon dioxide emissions by the EPA    
  • planning for contracts in renewable energy and energy storage R&D at LANL, with the goal of enhancing LANL job security                                                               
  • building code upgrades to require more energy efficient LEED standards in both commercial and residential buildings
  • incentives to the Navajo Nation to build a solar thermal electric plant, delaying a coal plant until clean  coal technology is developed
  • expanded training classes in photovoltaics at District 3 colleges so that our region can benefit from job creation in the solar industry 
  • the U.S. becoming a member and lead proponent of the International Renewable Energy Agency

ENVIRONMENT             I support: 

  • strong U.S. leadership to reduce global-warming emissions and attain sustainability through domestic  action and international treaties
  • putting “energy corridors” on hold pending national efforts to develop a strategy of localized electric  generation
  • further reform of federal mineral extraction laws, including:  stronger water & habitat safeguards;  banning toxic chemicals; conveyance of mineral rights with private land in future sales;  law allowing   current landowners first purchase of their mineral rights 
  • a farm bill that encourages native seeds & organic, locally produced food         
  • federal policy to support ethanol from cellulose
  •  accelerated clean-up at LANL waste sites upstream from Santa Fe’s  Rio Grande drinking water diversion
  • accelerated clean-up of uranium mining contamination sites on the Navajo Nation
  • efforts to expedite claims payments to former LANL employees exposed to hazardous materials
  • funding regional water systems in New Mexico, including the Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project & funds to settle the Aamodt suit
  • maintenance of our acequia systems    ~    clean, living rivers in our region, with water conservation codes to support this  

Not Just Galisteo Basin:

Candidate's December 26, 2007 Letter to The Santa Fe New Mexican

and the Santa Fe County Commissioners

 

                The wildlife-rich Galisteo Basin is a fragile ecosystem. I urge the Santa Fe County commissioners to adopt an oil-drilling ordinance that protects this land and its aquifer with strict limits on chemical use, a closed-loop system, large setbacks from homes and water wells, and no variances. However, this ordinance is not just about the Galisteo Basin but about the entire county and the way forward in energy production here. So that the commissioners can reduce for themselves pressure from oil-drilling interests, I urge that the public be allowed a major role (even a county-wide vote) in the way forward, perhaps with some of the suggestions below.

 

1.    Slow down, to allow the public and the land, not just oil, to frame the ordinance. Institute perhaps a two-year moratorium on oil leases to allow issuance of an updated county-wide comprehensive resource management plan, similar to the 3-year moratorium and resource planning going on at BLM. This resource plan would seek to expand the ecological and cultural map overlays the county is reportedly working on. For instance, water aquifer depths mapped for the entire county would be essential for determining where and at what depths oil wells could be drilled.

 

2.    Since our county is growing in population and home to the state capital, include in the resource plan a financial study of the competing land use activities. Compare projected state oil revenues with current and projected county-wide income from tourism, the art and artist industries, and new homebuilding itself, all of which rely on the harmonious landscape of the county.

 

3.    Make the resource plan look to the county’s and our children’s future. Consider rules for other energy development, perhaps limiting the height of any future wind generator towers, taking into account scenic values and future population land use. Look at encouraging homes, businesses and pueblos to develop photovoltaic power arrays, which are quiet, low lying and non-threatening to water, air, birds and views (relatively).

 

4.    While realizing the shared demand for oil and that some oil extraction likely will take place, work to minimize the impact on homes and land by requiring that oil wells be clustered on sufficiently isolated pads, with the required use of directional drilling to extend extraction, rather than a larger grid of roads and pads.

 

5.    Create new county laws for transfer of property ownership, with the eventual aim and effect of eliminating split-estate private property. Require that land buyers be informed of the owner of mineral rights beneath their land, including contact information, and that buyers be given the right to purchase those mineral rights. Also, require that existing landowners be notified of planned mineral-rights acquisition under their land, and be given the first right to purchase those rights by bettering a mineral extractor's offer.

 

The county drilling ordinance affects the land, lives and income of private landowners. Reportedly, some mineral rights were obtained without landowner knowledge. Doesn’t it make sense to fully involve the public and issue the revised county oil-drilling ordinance after, and as part of, a comprehensive resource/land-use management plan review?

 

LANL: The Future of Energy Research

From: Ron Simmons

To: National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of Energy

Re: Complex Transformation

In two years Santa Fe will get its drinking water from the Rio Grande, a short distance downstream from the canyons where LANL intends to increase plutonium pit production for nuclear weapons.
                Whether or not modern practices will avoid a repeat of the contamination that happened at Rocky Flats in Colorado is issue # 1.  Issue # 2 is the opinion of some scientists that existing pits are viable for another 40 to 80 years.  Issue #3 is whether the United States should be leading in abiding by the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, so that the international law of the NNPT can be enforced on all countries.  I don't believe
we can be successful in preventing developing countries from pursuing nuclear weapons unless we engage with them toe-to-toe
in disarmament. Issue #4 relates to the existing contamination on-site at LANL.  I encourage the Energy Department to finish the clean-up of the last 65 years of nuclear work at Los Alamos, preferably by removal of all waste to approved waste sites.  The porous volcanic strata and geology of canyons and tributaries that empty into the Rio Grande just north of the Santa Fe drinking-water diversion argue for quick and complete removal of waste. Issue #5 is the urgent need for our nation to transform our Energy Department labs to the task of renewable
energy research and development.
                 Our scientists at Los Alamos are a national resource and treasure.  Let's use them and the Los Alamos lab to make our nation the leader in solar photovoltaics, solar thermal, wind, geothermal, battery, cellulosic ethanol, clean coal and energy storage research and development.  Implement partnerships with New Mexico colleges and businesses to create new jobs for New Mexico.  Let's follow the lead of Germany in this regard.